Sorry your honour - Society & The Arts News - Issue Date: Sep 10,In recent times, we have grown accustomed to believing that the judicial system is in a shambles, or at least dangerously on the verge of collapse. The possible reasons are known: exploding dockets, poor infrastructure, chronic shortage of judges and judicial staff, and a set of procedures that privileges adjournment over disposal. To the public at large, deep suspicions about class bias and corruption in the judiciary, as well as a belief that it is given to pliancy before power, influence and wealth are much larger concerns. At the same time, one cannot ignore the ambivalence in the way our society looks at the judiciary. On the one hand, much of the citizenry looks up to the judiciary as a bulwark against executive excesses and legislative caprice.
Courts and Their Judgments
Jump to navigation. Armed with a written constitution, our proud boast has always been that we are a nation governed by laws and not by men. Arun Shourie's new book shows that this is true only in theory: the law is ultimately what the justices of the final court say it is. The book is a critique of the work of the court - an effective and timely counterpoint to the paean of praises on the court's functioning during its golden jubilee celebrations at the turn of the new century. Shourie's lack of formal legal training is neither noticeable nor apparent in the text. His rich experience gathered over the years from successful forays into journalism, from prolific writings on a host of different subjects and from his sojourn in Parliament as a minister has helped to contribute to a clarity of thought and fluency of expression on a difficult subject. The author has definite points of view about the "judicial approach" to sundry problems and he gives expression to them forcefully - and without the hypocrisy associated with people and opinions that emanate from the capital city.
In his well researched book “Courts and their Judgments”, Arun Shourie holds that while the executive is responsible for the existing paralysis in the country no .
genetics by bd singh pdf free download
Search This Blog
Courts were like holy cows for me til I read this book. After reading this book I realised that judges also tend to view the issues before them with their personal bias instead of an objective view. A must read for all. Certified Buyer , Bellary. Certified Buyer , Chennai.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover.
Free for one month and pay only if you like it. The editorial reads as under:. Succinct, understated to the point of being deferential, scrupulously adhering to facts and law, eschewing completely the slightest attribution of any motive to the Commission, the opinion is a model of rectitude. It is the longest possible list of suppresso veri suggesto falsi. If there had been any sense of honour or shame, a Judge would never have done any of this.