Free Speech on Campus – UCLA Equity, Diversity & InclusionEbook Library. Please choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours. Finding libraries that hold this item A masterful analysis of a cherished American right and a must-read for higher education leaders. With this book, we finally have it, a subtle yet passionate-and easily readable-overview that should guide all students as well as the rest of us.
Is Free Speech On College Campuses At Risk? - NBC News Now
Free speech on campus
Debates about free speech and academic freedom—and their limits—have become sharper but also more confused. Conservatives demand greater restrictions, but so too do radicals worried that offensive speech may disrupt campus communities. Universities have a special responsibility to secure the right balance between free expression and offensive speech. He is also the Commissioner for Fair Access for Scotland. Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer. Keywords: Free Speech, academic freedom, political correctness. Abstract Debates about free speech and academic freedom—and their limits—have become sharper but also more confused.
Contemporary Political Theory. Ben-Porath and the duo of Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman offer nuanced, thoughtful, and balanced books on campus freedom of speech. Each of these books is striking for its empathy. No doubt because the authors have dealt with the complicated tradeoffs between protecting free speech and limiting the harms of hateful speech on their own campuses, they are able to understand the multiple stances in these debates extremely well. In the end, the two books stake out quite similar positions, grounded in the American legal conception of robust protections for free speech. They do so, however, without the closed-minded finger-wagging commonly associated with critics of university speech restrictions. Even if you disagree with elements of their free speech advocacy, their empathy with the targets of hate speech invites a dialogue rather than the shouting match that frequently accompanies these discussions.